AMSCI Newsletter October 2025

October 2025 Market Update

The Federal Reserve announced on Oct. 29 that it would cut interest rates by a quarter-point for the second month in a row – and only the second time since December 2024.

“Available indicators suggest that economic activity has been expanding at a moderate pace,” the central bank’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) stated in its announcement. “Job gains have slowed this year, and the unemployment rate has edged up but remained low through August; more recent indicators are consistent with these developments. Inflation has moved up since earlier in the year and remains somewhat elevated.”

The vote was 10-2, with one committee member preferring a half-point cut and another wanting no change. The target range for the Federal Funds Rate is now 3.75-4 percent.

While the reduction was not surprising, there had been some uncertainty about what the Fed would do, given that inflation has climbed steadily since the spring, from an annualized rate of 2.3 percent in April to 3 percent in September, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported. Costs have not risen at a faster pace since May 2024, when the rate was 3.3 percent.

The softening labor market was likely a significant factor in the Fed’s decision, as the economy added a net of just 107,000 jobs from May through August, according to the BLS. Official job creation statistics for September are not available because of the federal government shutdown that began Oct. 1, but forecasters had expected gains of around 50,000 positions. The unemployment rate, based on August data, is 4.3 percent.

The next meeting of the FOMC is scheduled for December.

“In the committee’s discussions at this meeting, there were strongly differing views about how to proceed in December,” Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said after the October gathering. “A further reduction in the policy rate at the December meeting is not a foregone conclusion. Far from it.”

Markets dipped following the indication from Powell that the Fed might not give the economy another boost this year.

Normally, the Bureau of Economic Analysis would have released in late October its assessment of growth during the second quarter, but, like the unemployment numbers, this economic indicator has not been calculated because of the shutdown. In mid-October, Powell lamented not having the analyses from government economists and statisticians.

“Generally, the private data, the alternative data that we look at, is better used as a supplement for the underlying governmental data, which is the gold standard,” Powell said. “It won’t be as effective as the main course as it would have been as a supplement.”

Members of Congress, meanwhile, appear to have made little, if any, progress toward a resolution of the budget impasse. Although Republicans control both the House and Senate, Democrats have used the Senate’s filibuster rule to block passage of a funding measure and are demanding that the GOP negotiate expired Affordable Care Act (ObamaCare) subsidies. Pressure could be increasing on Democrats, though, as the American Federation of Government Employees labor union on Oct. 27 said, “it’s time to pass a clean continuing resolution and end this shutdown.” In addition, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), which provides food assistance to 41 million people, will run out of funding on Nov. 1.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that the shutdown will knock 1 percent off the annualized gross domestic product (GDP) growth rate in the fourth quarter because of reduced government spending if the shutdown ends by early November. That number would increase to 2 percent if another month passes without a federal budget.

“Real GDP will rebound when federal funding resumes, with most of the forgone output made up in the future,” the CBO stated. “The reduction in output stemming from the time furloughed employees did not work will not be recovered.”

So far, the shutdown does not appear to have had much of an impact on consumers’ views of the economy. The Index of Consumer Sentiment from the University of Michigan’s Surveys of Consumers dipped 2.7 percent from September to October, but the program director said that, in the survey data, “There was little evidence this month that consumers connect the federal government shutdown to the economy.”

The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index slipped less than 1 percent from September to October, with the group’s senior economist, global indicators, saying, “Consumers were a bit more pessimistic about future job availability and future business conditions while optimism about future income retreated slightly.”

“Consumers’ write-in responses were led by references to prices and inflation, which continued to be the main topic influencing consumers’ views of the economy,” the economist said. “References to tariffs declined further this month but remained elevated.”

In the manufacturing sector, confidence remained middling, as the Institute for Supply Management’s Purchasing Managers Index inched up less than 1 percent and, for the seventh straight month – and 10th month out of the last 12 – remained below the level separating expansion from contraction.

“Regarding output, the Production and Employment indexes improved, though 64 percent of panelists’ comments still indicated that managing head count is still the norm at their companies, as opposed to hiring,” the chair of the institute’s Manufacturing Business Survey Committee said. “Finally, inputs (defined as supplier deliveries, inventories, prices and imports), on net, moved further into contraction territory.”

Existing home sales in September increased 1.5 percent from August, according to the National Association of Realtors.

“As anticipated, falling mortgage rates are lifting home sales,” the association’s chief economist said. “Improving housing affordability is also contributing to the increase in sales.”

The median existing home sales price in September was $415,200, 2.1 percent higher than in September 2024.

Data on housing starts, which is usually compiled by the Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development, has not been released since September because of the shutdown.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 47,632 on Oct. 29, up almost 12 percent for the year. The S&P 500 Index ended the day at 6,890.59, recording year-to-date gains of 17.2 percent.

The dollar on Oct. 29 was trading at 0.86 euros, 0.76 pounds, 153.05 yen and 7.1 yuan.

October 2025 Steel Shorts

Europe Considering Tight Limits on Steel Imports

European regulators may impose even sharper restrictions on steel imports than are already in place.

In early October, the European Commission proposed cutting nearly in half the amount of steel that can be imported tariff-free and doubling the duty on imports in excess of that amount. The proposed quota of 18.3 million metric tons per year would match the import level in 2013, which, Reuters reported, is the year that the commission identified as the beginning of global overcapacity.

The measures would replace the bloc’s current safeguards, which will expire in mid-2026.

“A strong, decarbonized steel sector is vital for the European Union’s competitiveness, economic security and strategic autonomy,” commission President Ursula von der Leyen said. “Global overcapacity is damaging our industry. We need to act now.”

The commission in March unveiled a “Steel and Metals Action Plan” that was “designed to strengthen the sector’s competitiveness and safeguard the industry’s future.”

U.S., U.K., E.U. Discussing Possible Steel Alliance

The United Kingdom is reportedly seeking to create a tripartite steel alliance to address global overcapacity, especially from China.

Financial Times reported that the British are talking with the United States and the European Union about forming such a partnership.

“We’re in continuous discussion about how we could make this happen,” U.K. Minister for Trade Chris Bryant told the Times. He added, “The three [parties] have a shared perception that there is overcapacity in the world. We all need to have our own sovereign steel capacity for economic security reasons, for building tanks and all the rest of it.”

The United States and the European Union are the United Kingdom’s two biggest trade partners. The Trump administration this year implemented tariffs of 25 percent on steel and aluminum shipments to the U.S., while the E.U. is considering halving its quota for tariff-free steel imports and doubling tariffs on additional tonnage entering the continent.

Aluminum Association Advocating Before USMCA Update

An association of domestic aluminum producers has expressed concerns that updates to the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) might ease America’s tariffs on aluminum without reciprocation by its neighbors, Fastmarkets reported.

A review of the USMCA – which replaced the North American Free Trade Association (NAFTA) in 2020 – by all three nations is scheduled to begin on July 1, 2026. Leading up to that, the U.S. Trade Representative is seeking public comments “on the operation of the Agreement.”

“We have been very clear with the U.S. government that if any preferential treatment is given to our closest trading partners in a future free trade deal, it must include provisions that are as successful at protecting the U.S. aluminum industry as the actions that the U.S. government has taken,” Aluminum Association president and chief executive officer Charles Johnson said in September.

In October, another association official, Vice President of External Affairs Matt Meenan, said that that harmonization of tariffs should extend beyond trade between the three nations: “If the U.S. has a certain tariff against unfairly traded metal from China or Russia, then we think Canada and Mexico should have a similar set of tariffs.”

Public comments can be submitted to the U.S. Trade Representative until Nov. 3. A public hearing will be held on the USMCA in Washington, D.C., on Nov. 17.

International Trade Commission Sees Material Injury from CORE Imports

The U.S. International Trade Commission in September determined that the U.S. steel industry is materially injured by imports of corrosion-resistant (CORE) steel products from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam.

The previous month, the Department of Commerce announced final affirmative determinations in antidumping duty and countervailing duty investigations of the imports. The determinations set antidumping duties of as much as 191.26 percent on imports from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam, and set countervailing duties of up to 16.84 percent on imports from Brazil, Canada, Mexico and Vietnam.

After the commission’s finding of material injury, the Commerce Department was to issue antidumping duty orders and countervailing duty orders regarding the imports.

CORE steel products are used in, among other things, automobiles, appliances and commercial and residential buildings.

CUSTOMS CORNER

Section 232 Procedures for Adding Derivatives Requires Ongoing Diligence

President Trump significantly expanded Section 232 coverage for derivatives when he announced changes to the steel and aluminum remedies on February 10, 2025. Those actions not only removed the country exemptions, quota arrangements, and product exclusions that had previously applied, and added numerous new derivative products to the Section 232 coverage lists; they also ordered the establishment of a Section 232 Inclusions Process. This Process, established and operated by the Bureau of Industry and Security of the Department of Commerce, provides for periodic time periods during which parties can request that additional products be added to the lists of derivatives covered by Section 232.

Additional Section 232 remedies imposed on copper, timber and lumber, auto parts, and heavy duty vehicle parts have all included inclusions processes.  The auto parts process is already in effect, with the copper process due to be announced by the end of October. Future remedies (there are current investigations of critical processed minerals, commercial aircraft and jet engines, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and robots and industrial machinery, among others) are expected to include their own inclusions processes.

The processes that have been announced and implemented provide for periodic time “windows” – either quarterly or three times a year – during which parties can request that products be added to the derivatives (or parts) lists. The request period is open for two weeks, following which the list of requests is published by BIS. That opens a two week window for public comments. Detailed procedures cover the information that must be included in a request, and how requests and comments are to be filed. Decisions on whether to include new products must be made within a specified time – so far 60 or 90 days.

The initial inclusions process reviews for steel and aluminum involved requests for the addition of almost 500 new products. BIS granted 407 product requests (428 HTS codes.) The 60 products for which addition was denied were stated to all be products which were under investigation already in separate Section 232 or other investigations. The new products added almost doubled the number of products included in the Section 232 remedies.

While a few of the products added were actual steel or aluminum articles classified in HTSUS Chapters 72, 73, and 76, many were food, chemicals, paint, etc. packaged in metal containers; tools, cutlery and tableware; industrial machinery and equipment containing metal parts; vehicles and parts; and furniture.

The opportunity for parties to seek new product additions several times a year, the very short time frames involved for identifying and commenting on requests, and the almost automatic approval of requests (so far) by BIS places a high  burden on importers to monitor and respond to such requests. This is enhanced by the wide array of products included in the review process, many with little steel or aluminum (or copper or wood) content (there is no  de minimis level.) A number of the products also seem to have little if any national security relevance (the basis for Section 232.)

Steven W. Baker
AMSCI Customs Committee Chair
swbaker@swbakerlaw.com

Upcoming AMSCI Events – Save the Dates!
AMSCI 74th Annual Dinner - SOLD OUT

Date: Wednesday, November 19, 2025
Time: 5:00 PM – 7:00 PM | Cocktail Networking Reception (Cambridge Room)

          7:00 PM – 9:00 PM | Dinner (Harvard Hall)
Location: The Harvard Club of NYC
Formal dinner and networking in a historic New York venue.

🎄 AMSCI Annual Gulf Region Christmas Dinner

Date: Thursday, December 11, 2025
Time: 5:00 PM – 9:00 PM
Location: Aspen Ballroom, The Houstonian Hotel, Club & Spa | Houston, TX
 Celebrate the season with industry peers in a festive setting.
 RSVP Here