AMSCI NEWSLETTER June 2024
June 2024 Market Update
The combination of elevated inflation and a strong labor market continue to push lower interest rates further away.
Prices in April were 3.4 percent higher than a year earlier and were up 0.3 percent from the previous month, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. About 70 percent of the monthly increase resulted from shelter and gasoline costs.
After the annualized inflation rate reached 9.1 percent in June 2022, it fell each month for a year before bottoming out at 3 percent in June 2023. Since then, inflation has fluctuated between that level and 3.7 percent.
Some analysts are pointing to a recent slowdown in personal spending – which grew 0.2 percent from March to April following back-to-back months at 0.7 percent – as an indication that inflation rates might soon dip below 3 percent.
“People have been pinched for a while, and it’s likely starting to show,” a senior economist at NerdWallet told Reuters, adding, “This cooling is encouraging for slower inflation in the coming months.”
This data point, however, has varied significantly from month to month during the past year and was at 0.1 percent in January before the two straight months of 0.7 percent increases.
Consumer spending accounts for more than two-thirds of economic growth, so reductions here could make a recession more probable. Concerns about the overall health of the economy, though, are assuaged on a monthly basis by another report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics that regularly shows strong job creation and a low unemployment rate. In May, the economy exceeded expectations by creating 272,000 jobs, including 68,000 jobs in health care and more than 40,000 in both government and hospitality.
Wage increases were also higher than expected, growing 0.4 percent from April and 4.1 percent from May 2023. While economic growth in the first quarter of the year was just 1.3 percent, the employment and wage numbers, many analysts say, are likely enough to convince the Federal Reserve to keep waiting before reducing interest rates.
“Today’s data undermines the message that other recent economic data have been giving of a cooling U.S. economy, and slams the door shut on a July rate cut,” the chief global strategist at Principal Asset Management said, according to CNBC. “Not only has jobs growth exploded again, but wage growth has also surprised to the upside, both moving in the opposite direction to what the Fed needs to begin easing policy.”
The target range for the Federal Reserve’s Federal Funds Rate has been 5.25 to 5.5 percent since July 2023. The last time the Fed reduced rates was in March 2020 in response to the economic emergency created by the Covid-19 pandemic. The target range was 0 to 0.25 percent for the next two years, until concerns about inflation led to a series of hikes over the following 16 months.
During the rest of 2024, the Federal Reserve Federal Open Market Committee is scheduled to meet on June 11-12, July 30-31, Sept. 17-18, Nov. 6-7, and Dec. 17-18. Investor’s Business Daily on June 9 reported that, given recent economic data, “there is essentially no chance of a Fed rate cut” in June. The publication allowed for a very small chance in July and called September “a toss-up,” noting that, “Investors see a 50.5% chance of a quarter-point rate cut” at that meeting. Reductions are seen as much more likely than not in November and December. However, rate cuts this spring and summer were once seen as near certainties before prices stayed high.
The Federal Reserve’s target inflation rate is 2 percent and, following its April 30-May 1 meeting, it noted that, “Inflation has eased over the past year but remains elevated. In recent months, there has been a lack of further progress toward the Committee’s 2 percent inflation objective.”
At the same time, the central bank has not faced pressures to spur the economy through lower rates because “Recent indicators suggest that economic activity has continued to expand at a solid pace. Job gains have remained strong, and the unemployment rate has remained low.” As a result, “The Committee does not expect it will be appropriate to reduce the target range until it has gained greater confidence that inflation is moving sustainably toward 2 percent.”
The inflation and labor market data that have been released since that meeting seem unlikely to change the Fed’s approach.
Consumer confidence increased in May for the first time in four months, according to The Conference Board, but the organization cautioned that “Consumers remain anxious about the future.”
The board’s Consumer Confidence Index went up by 4.6 percent, with the group’s chief economist noting that “the strong labor market continued to bolster consumers’ overall assessment of the present situation,” but concerns about inflation remain.
“Consumers cited prices, especially for food and groceries, as having the greatest impact on their view of the U.S. economy,” the chief economist added. “The survey also revealed a possible resurgence in recession concerns.”
Another measure of consumer attitudes dipped sharply from April to May. The Index of Consumer Sentiment from the University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers fell by 10.5 percent month to month, though it was still more than 17 percent higher than in May 2023.
The surveys’ director said that consumers “expect unemployment rates to rise and income growth to slow.”
“The prospect of continued high interest rates also weighed down consumer views,” the director added. “These deteriorating expectations suggest that multiple factors pose downside risk for consumer spending.”
Housing starts increased by 11 percent from March to April but were slightly below the total in April of last year, according to the Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Existing home sales decreased by 1.9 percent from March to April, while the median sales price for existing homes increased by 5.7 percent year over year to $407,600, the National Association of Realtors reported.
“Home prices reaching a record high for the month of April is very good news for homeowners,” the association’s chief economist said. “However, the pace of price increases should taper off since more housing inventory is becoming available.”
The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 38,798.99 on June 7 for a year-to-date gain of just under 3 percent. The S&P 500 Index ended the day at 5,346.99, up more than 12 percent on the year.
The dollar on June 7 was trading at 0.93 euros, 0.79 pounds, 156.61 yen and 7.25 yuan.
With less than five months to go until the presidential election, the economy is sure to have a key role in the campaign. Even with all of the objective data that is available, views on the health of the economy, as is often the case, diverge along party lines. The Guardian reported that a Harris poll conducted in May found that 67 percent of Republicans incorrectly believe that the economy is in a recession, compared to 49 percent of Democrats who think that and 53 percent of independents. “The survey continued a trend of Republicans reporting higher levels of pessimism about the nation’s finances since Biden took office,” the publication stated. The saying that people vote with their pocketbooks may need to be revised to, people vote with their perception of their pocketbooks.
Welcome New Member!
800 Town and Coutry Blvd, Suite 500
Houston Texas
Contact:
Serhat Ozakyol, President
Phone: 346 476 3496
E-mail: Serhat.Ozakyou@krmyb.com
KRM&YB INVESTMENT CO is the member of YUCEL GROUP, based in Turkey, who is acting in the field of manufacturing various steel products and exporting all around the world.
Our Group produces Rebar, Wire Rod, Rebar in Coil, Spooler, Merchant Bar, ERW Hollow Section Profile, Construction Pipe, Galvanized and Black Water pipes, Boiler Pipes, Casing, Tubing Scaffolding Pipes, Petroleum Pipes, OCTG, Bright Bars, Precious Tubes products.
Steel Shorts April 2024
Tax Foundation Notes High Costs of Section 232 Tariffs
The Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum have increased prices and effectively cost $650,000 for every domestic job they “saved,” according to a report released in May by The Tax Foundation.
In 2018, the Trump administration imposed 25 percent tariffs on most steel imports and 10 percent tariffs on most aluminum imports in the name of advancing national security. The Biden administration has maintained the tariffs, though, over the years, the United States has reached alternate agreements with several countries.
The report noted that, according to the U.S. International Trade Commission, the tariffs increased the price of covered steel imports by 22.7 percent and the price of covered aluminum imports by 8 percent, while raising overall steel prices by 2.4 percent and overall aluminum prices by 1.6 percent.
The Tax Foundation estimated that repealing the tariffs would add about $4.2 billion and 4,000 jobs to the economy, with those numbers increasing by as much as 50 percent if other countries were to lift the retaliatory tariffs that have been imposed.
“Downstream industries that use steel and aluminum were negatively affected, experiencing an annual $3.4 billion loss in production from 2018 to 2021,” the report stated. “Because tariffs are taxes on imports and raise the cost of production, we estimate that repealing the Section 232 tariffs would strengthen the U.S. economy and create jobs.”
Section 301 Tariffs on Chinese Steel and Aluminum More than Triple
The Biden Administration in May more than tripled tariffs on certain steel and aluminum imports from China.
The move increased the Section 301 tariffs on Chinese steel to 25 percent, up from a maximum of 7.5 percent.
“American workers continue to face unfair competition from China’s non-market overcapacity in steel and aluminum, which are among the world’s most carbon intensive,” a fact sheet from the White House stated. “China’s policies and subsidies for their domestic steel and aluminum industries mean high-quality, low-emissions U.S. products are undercut by artificially low-priced Chinese alternatives produced with higher emissions. Today’s actions will shield the U.S. steel and aluminum industries from China’s unfair trade practices.”
The administration also revised Section 301 tariffs on other Chinese imports, including semiconductors, electric vehicles, batteries, solar cells, ship-to-shore cranes, and medical products.
Proposed Nippon-U.S. Steel Deal Receives Non-U.S. Regulatory Approvals
Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel announced on May 30 that they have received “all non-U.S. regulatory approvals” required for the Japanese firm to purchase the American steelmaker.
The approvals have come from the European Commission and regulatory bodies in the United Kingdom, Mexico, Serbia, Slovakia and Turkey.
“This deal is the best deal for American steel, the best deal for American jobs and the best deal for America’s ability to create an even stronger alliance with Japan against China,” U.S. Steel President and CEO David Burritt said.
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) is examining the potential purchase, but President Biden has already come out against the $15 billion deal, saying to members of the United Steelworkers union in April that U.S. Steel “has been an iconic American company for more than a century and it should remain totally American.”
Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has also said that, if elected, he would block the deal.
The companies are seeking to complete the purchase by the end of the year.
Aluminum Prices Could Spike Following Sanctions on Russia
With the European Union considering a ban on Russian aluminum, Reuters reported that such a move could mean that Europeans and Americans will “compete aggressively” for aluminum from other nations and drive up prices.
The news outlet noted that Europe would have to replace 500,000 tons of aluminum that it now gets from Russia. The United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and certain other Middle Eastern countries could be among the key sources.
This sourcing shift, Reuters wrote, “will fuel inflation for Western companies in the transport, packaging and construction industries – already facing high raw material and payroll costs.”
The United States (and the United Kingdom) in April prohibited the importation of aluminum, copper and nickel from Russia.
CUSTOMS CORNER
Section 301 Four Year Review Affects Steel, Aluminum, and Critical Materials
The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) announced the results of the mandated four year review of Section 301 tariffs (which review itself took almost two years.) Not unexpectedly , the review resulted in recommendations to the President to maintain most Section 301 duties, while increasing or adding duties for certain products in strategic sectors. Many of those changes affect basic steel and aluminum products, and both metallic and non-metallic critical materials. Comments on the proposals are required to be filed by June 28, 2024, using the online portal.
Steel and aluminum products affected (and listed in the above notice) are those which are currently subject to 7.5% duties under the List 4A designations. For these products the Section 301 duty rate is proposed to increase to 25% on August 1, 2024. Products included in Section 301 under the earlier Lists, such as steel buildings and components in HTS 7308, remain subject to those 25% duties. Most of these products also remain subject to Section 232 25% duties on steel and 10% on aluminum.
The proposal covers certain critical minerals including ores and concentrates of manganese, cobalt, aluminum, zinc, chromium, and tungsten, also increased to a 25% duty rate on August 1, 2024. (A number of radioactive minerals are also included.) Many of these items were previously exempt from Section 301 duties.
The proposal also covers a number of critical materials that are metallics, including certain ferronickel, ferrochromium, ferroniobium, zinc, tin, tungsten, tantalum, chromium , and Indium products. Like the minerals listed above, these items are proposed to go to a 25% duty rate on August 1, 2024. Many of these items as well were not previously subject to Section 301 duties.
25% Section 301 duties are also proposed for various natural graphite articles, not previously subject to Section 301, to go into effect on January 1, 2026.
The USTR proposal, in addition to the steel, aluminum, and critical materials discussed above, includes additional duties from 25% up to 100% on electric vehicles, EV batteries and parts, certain facemasks and surgical gloves, syringes and medical needles, permanent magnets, certain semiconductors and integrated circuits, solar cells, and ship-to-shore cranes. These rates are proposed to be applied variously on August 1, 2024, January 1, 2025, and January 1, 2026.
Finally, the proposal includes a temporary exclusion process, applicable for a wide range of production machinery used in domestic manufacturing, and also for solar manufacturing equipment. This will require specific exclusion applications by interested persons.
The recommended actions, including maintaining and increasing certain duties, are intended “[t]o further encourage China to eliminate the investigated acts, policies, and practices,” and enhance “the effectiveness of the tariff actions.” The changes affect “products targeted by China for dominance,” and “products in sectors where the United States has recently made significant investments.”
Steven W. Baker
AMSCI Customs Committee Chair
swbaker@swbakerlaw.com
Upcoming Events
2024 AMSCI Annual Gala Dinner | Thursday, November 14, 2024
50 Vanderbilt Avenue
New York, New York 10017
2024 AMSCI Christmas Dinner | Thursday, December 12, 2024
111 North Post Oak Lane
Houston, TX 77024