AMSCI NEWSLETTER April 2024

April 2024 Market Update

If an interest rate reduction were a piece of fruit, the U.S. economy would be the mythological figure Tantalus, constantly reaching for it, but never quite able to grasp it.

Not long ago, members of the Federal Reserve – who, in this scenario, are akin to the Olympian gods who deemed that the object of desire should remain just out of reach – was expected to soon begin to reduce rates for the first time since their anti-inflation campaign of rate hikes began in March 2022. In fact, as many as three rate cuts were widely expected this year.

However, inflation, while having eased, has remained stubbornly high, refusing to sink below 3 percent, much less approach the Fed’s target of 2 percent. As a result, the lower rates that appear so close keep receding.

“The recent data have clearly not given us greater confidence [that inflation has been contained] and instead indicate that it’s likely to take longer than expected to achieve that confidence,” Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell said on April 16. He added, “Right now, given the strength of the labor market and progress on inflation so far, it’s appropriate to allow restrictive policy further time to work and let the data and the evolving outlook guide us.”

As for other members of the Fed’s Federal Open Market Committee, which sets the target range for the Federal Funds Rate (currently 5.25 to 5.5 percent), the minutes of the committee’s most recent meeting on March 19-20 note that “Participants generally commented that they remained highly attentive to inflation risks but that they had also anticipated that there would be some unevenness in monthly inflation readings as inflation returned to target.”

“Participants judged that the policy rate was likely at its peak for this tightening cycle, and almost all participants judged that it would be appropriate to move policy to a less restrictive stance at some point this year if the economy evolved broadly as they expected,” the minutes recorded. “In support of this view, they noted that the disinflation process was continuing along a path that was generally expected to be somewhat uneven.”

In March, the consumer price index showed a 3.5 percent increase from a year earlier, while prices jumped 0.4 percent from February, the second straight month of 0.4 percent inflation, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

“The index for shelter rose in March, as did the index for gasoline,” the bureau stated. “Combined, these two indexes contributed over half of the monthly increase in the index for all items. The energy index rose 1.1 percent over the month.”

Notably, the year-over-year core inflation rate, which excludes food and energy and, as a result, is often lower than the overall rate, was 3.8 percent in March. This was largely because of increasing shelter costs, which rose 5.7 percent and accounted for 60 percent of the increase in the core rate.

One factor that could encourage a rate reduction sooner rather than later is that the economy underperformed in the first quarter. While analysts had expected an annualized growth rate of around 2.2 percent for the January through March period, the actual number was 1.6 percent, well below both projections and the Q4 rate of 3.4 percent, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

As has become standard in recent years, monthly job creation is strong, with the economy adding 303,000 positions in March, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported. The unemployment rate is now 3.8 percent and has been below 4 percent since February 2022.

Confidence among manufacturers, as measured by the Institute for Supply Management Purchasing Managers Index, showed its largest gain in three years and crossed the threshold that indicates expansion in the sector for the first time since September 2022.

“Demand remains at the early stages of recovery, with clear signs of improving conditions,” the chair of the institute’s Manufacturing Business Survey Committee said. “Production execution surged compared to January and February, as panelists’ companies reenter expansion. Suppliers continue to have capacity but are showing signs of struggling, due in large part to their raw material supply chains.”

Consumer confidence has not moved much in recent months. The March Consumer Confidence Index from The Conference Board was essentially unchanged from February.

“Over the last six months, confidence has been moving sideways with no real trend to the upside or downside,” the board’s chief economist said, adding, “Consumers remained concerned with elevated price levels, which predominated write-in responses. March’s write-in responses showed an uptick in concerns about food and gas prices, but in general complaints about gas prices have been trending downward.”

A separate measure, the Index of Consumer Sentiment from the University of Michigan Surveys of Consumers, dipped 1.9 percent from March to April.

“Sentiment moved sideways for the fourth straight month, as consumers perceived few meaningful developments in the economy,” the Surveys of Consumers director said. “Since January, sentiment has remained remarkably steady within a very narrow … range.”

Housing starts in March fell 14.7 percent from February and 4.3 percent from March 2023, according to the Census Department and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Existing home sales decreased by 4.3 percent from February to March, the National Association of Realtors reported.

“Though rebounding from cyclical lows, home sales are stuck because interest rates have not made any major moves,” the association’s chief economist said.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 37,986.40 on April 19, recording a year-to-date gain of 0.8 percent. The S&P 500 Index ended the same day at 4,967.23, up 4.1 percent on the year. The Dow fell 5.2 percent between March 28 and April 17, while the S&P dropped 4.5 percent between April 11 and April 19.

The dollar on April 19 was trading at 0.94 euros, 0.8 pounds, 154.54 yen and 7.24 yuan.

The Federal Reserve Federal Open Market Committee has six meetings remaining in 2024, with the next one to be held on April 30-May 1. No major action is expected, though. In fact, given the inflation statistics, many analysts are now looking to the fall, at the earliest, for a rate reduction.

Upcoming Events

AMSCI Golf and Dinner at the Wash House | Tuesday, June 11, 2024

Lakewood Golf Club
5910 Lakewood Dr, Fairhope, AL 36532

Register here

2024 AMSCI Annual Gala Dinner | Thursday, November 14, 2024

The Yale Club of New York City
50 Vanderbilt Avenue
New York, New York 10017

2024 AMSCI Christmas Dinner | Thursday, December 12, 2024

The Houstonian Hotel, Club & Spa
111 North Post Oak Lane
Houston, TX 77024

Steel Shorts April 2024

Biden Seeks to Triple Tariffs on Steel, Aluminum from China

The Biden administration on April 17 announced that it is seeking to triple the tariffs on steel and aluminum imported from China.

President Biden is asking the U.S. Trade Representative, who is currently reviewing Section 301 tariffs on China, to increase the steel and aluminum levies from an average of 7.5 percent to 22.5 percent.

The White House indicated that the tariff rate increase is intended to support “American-made” metals and to promote sustainability in the steel and aluminum sectors.

“American workers continue to face unfair competition from Chinese imports of steel and aluminum products, which are among the world’s most emissions- intensive,” the White House stated. “Chinese policies and subsidies for their domestic steel and aluminum industries means high-quality U.S. products are undercut by artificially low-priced Chinese alternatives produced with higher emissions.”

Biden is also directing officials to work with Mexico to prevent China and other countries from shipping steel and aluminum to the United States through that country to circumvent tariffs.

Biden Indicates He Will Block Nippon Purchase of U.S. Steel

President Biden appeared to pledge that he would block the purchase of U.S. Steel by the Japanese company Nippon Steel during remarks at the headquarters of United Steelworkers on April 10.

It was announced in December that Nippon would buy the American company for $15 billion, but the deal is subject to review by the federal government and multiple lawmakers in both parties have argued against it, citing the potential impact on American jobs and U.S. national security.

U.S. Steel, Biden said to members of the labor union, “has been an iconic American company for more than a century and it should remain totally American.”

“American-owned, American-operated by American union steelworkers – the best in the world – and that’s going to happen, I promise you,” Biden added.

Presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump has also said that, if elected, he would block the deal.

13 Senators Urge Action Against Certain Imports of Aluminum Extrusions

A bipartisan group of 13 senators wrote to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo on April 12 to express support for antidumping and countervailing duty petitions filed by the U.S. Aluminum Extruders Coalition.

The letter cites 14 countries, including China, India and Mexico, that it says “are exporting a high volume of aluminum extrusions at unfair prices, putting American workers at a disadvantage.”

“Domestic manufacturers and the workers who support the upstream and downstream aluminum supply chains here in the U.S. can’t compete with merchandise that’s subsidized and unfairly dumped, and we urge you to carefully review the Coalition’s submissions and act to ensure U.S.-based producers can compete on a fair and level playing field,” the lawmakers stated.

The letter was signed by 10 Democrats and three Republicans.

U.S., U.K. Restrict Trading of Russian Metals

The United States and the United Kingdom in April imposed restrictions on the trading of Russian metals in one of the most recent economic sanctions resulting from the invasion of Ukraine.

As Reuters reported, the move prohibits “metal-trading exchanges from accepting new aluminum, copper and nickel produced by Russia and [bars] the import of the metals into the U.S. and Britain.”

Russian metals that are already on the exchanges will be allowed to be traded, though Reuters reported that “officials said continued trading of Russian metals off of the exchanges is expected to be at a discount.”

“Our new prohibitions on key metals, in coordination with our partners in the United Kingdom, will continue to target the revenue Russia can earn to continue its brutal war against Ukraine,” Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said.

CUSTOMS CORNER

Section 232 Quota Imports from Korea Must Use eCERT Electronic Certification

Although subject to certification requirements from the Republic of Korea (ROK) since 2019, absolute quota shipments of steel covered by Section 232 can now only be entered with a Korean government issued electronic certification through CBP’s Electronic Certification System (eCERT.) U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) personnel advised the Annual Meeting of AMSCI’s Customs Committee last December that the agency was in the process of moving Section 232 quota certifications to the electronic system. The Korea requirement, although delayed for several years, is the first to be fully implemented.

The official announcement was published on April 5, 2024. A “soft reject” begins on April 22, 2024 during which imports without the official ROK government certificate number will receive a warning message and be directed to complete quota processing. Effective May 20, 2024, imports lacking the approved certificate number will not be permitted to file consumption entries or warehouse/FTZ withdrawals for consumption. https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/bulletins/394a6c9

The eCERT system will use the same format for the certification number as is currently used, and the process of adding the number to the entry will not change. Importers with Department of Commerce approved exclusions are required to present a Korea certificate of export with their entry.

The eCERT system is used in connection with a number of different license/document requirements for many different products, and requires the participation of the exporting country. Use of the system can give the exporting country more direct control over the applicable requirements. It also allows CBP to improve monitoring and compliance, and reduce fraud. The addition of other countries subject to Section 232 absolute quotas to the eCERT system is expected.

Steven W. Baker
AMSCI Customs Committee Chair
swbaker@swbakerlaw.com