AMSCI NEWSLETTER April 2023

April 2023 Market Update

The Federal Reserve is predicting an economic downturn this year – but it still might continue to raise interest rates.

A potential recession has been discussed for much of the past year as the Fed has increased the target range for the Federal Funds Rate from 0-0.25 percent in March 2022 to 4.75-5 percent now. While Fed Chairman Jerome Powell has frequently said that he is seeking a “soft landing” for the nation’s economy, the recent banking crisis, seen most prominently in the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, has led the central bank’s staff to predict that will not happen.

“Given their assessment of the potential economic effects of the recent banking- sector developments, the staff’s projection at the time of the March meeting included a mild recession starting later this year, with a recovery over the subsequent two years,” the minutes of the Federal Reserve Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) March 21-22 meeting stated.

Although the minutes do not indicate whether committee members agreed or disagreed with that forecast, they recorded that members acknowledged “that the developments in the banking sector that had occurred late in the intermeeting period affected their views of the economic and policy outlook and the uncertainty surrounding that outlook” and they “generally expected real GDP [Gross Domestic Product] to grow this year at a pace well below its long-run trend rate.”

“With inflation remaining unacceptably high, participants expected that a period of below-trend growth in real GDP would be needed to bring aggregate demand into better balance with aggregate supply and thereby reduce inflationary pressures,” the minutes stated.

Despite expectations that economic growth will slow – and maybe turn negative – another interest rate hike appears to be not unlikely, with a Reuters article even calling a quarter-point increase “the odds-on bet.”

“Chair Jerome Powell has said he does not want to risk stopping short of the mark on policy tightening, only to have to start raising rates again if inflation heats up again,” the article stated.

The decision will be made by the full FOMC, though, and one of the committee members, Chicago Federal Reserve President Austan Goolsbee, on April 11 called for “prudence and patience – for assessing the potential impact of financial stress on the real economy.”

“The foremost thing on my mind before our next meeting in May is trying to get a handle on this question about credit: Is it actually credit tightening,” Goolsbee said.

The Fed’s adversary for the past year has been inflation, with year-over-year prices reaching 9 percent last June before gradually coming down to 5 percent in March, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the lowest level in almost two years but still well above the central bank’s target of 2 percent. However, while prices overall increased by just 0.1 percent from February to March, core inflation, which excludes the food and energy sectors, increased by 0.4 percent month to month. Compared to a year earlier, core inflation was 5.6 percent.

A CNN article referred to 5 percent inflation as a possible “inflection point” at which, some economists say, price increases are no longer an emergency issue.

The article cited a study by the University of Massachusetts-Amherst Economics Department that stated, “Our findings suggest that it is not typically necessary to force down inflation to such low levels [below 5 percent], especially given that contractionary monetary policies succeed in controlling inflation primarily through the channel of raising mass unemployment and weakening workers’ bargaining power.”

Through it all, the labor market has remained strong, with the nation’s unemployment rate at 3.5 percent after the economy added 236,000 jobs in March, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

“Employment continued to trend up in leisure and hospitality, government, professional and business services, and health care,” the bureau stated.

Although companies are hiring, confidence in the manufacturing sector continues to slide. The Institute for Supply Management’s Purchasing Managers Index in March dropped to its lowest level since the early days of the pandemic in May 2020. The index of 46.3 was below the threshold for growth in the sector (50) for the fifth straight month and below the threshold for growth in the overall economy (48.7) for the fourth consecutive month.

“With Business Survey Committee panelists reporting softening new order rates over the previous 10 months, the March composite index reading reflects companies continuing to slow outputs to better match demand for the first half of 2023 and prepare for growth in the late summer/early fall period,” the chair of the institute’s Manufacturing Business Survey Committee said.

Among consumers, two separate confidence measures – The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index and the Index of Consumer Sentiment from the University of Michigan’s Surveys of Consumers – both showed small increases.

“While consumers feel a bit more confident about what’s ahead, they are slightly less optimistic about the current landscape,” the senior director for economics
at The Conference Board said. “The share of consumers saying jobs are ‘plentiful’ fell, while the share of those saying jobs are ‘not so plentiful’ rose.”

Consumers slowed their spending from February to March, with retail sales declining by 1 percent during that time, according to the Census Bureau. This followed a 0.2 percent decline from January to February.

“Sales fell among most retailers, including at auto dealers, gas stations, electronics stores, and home and garden stores,” the Associated Press

reported. “Gas-station sales plunged 5.5% in March, though the data isn’t adjusted for price changes, and gas prices fell last month. Excluding car dealers and gas stations, retail sales fell a less-dramatic 0.3%. Spending jumped 1.9% at online retailers and ticked up 0.1% at restaurants and bars.”

Housing starts in February were up 9.8 percent from January but were 18.4 percent lower than a year earlier, according to the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Census Bureau. Existing home sales ended a 12- month streak of declines by spiking 14.5 percent from January to February, the largest increase since July 2020.

“Conscious of changing mortgage rates, home buyers are taking advantage of any rate declines,” the association’s chief economist said. “Moreover, we’re seeing stronger sales gains in areas where home prices are decreasing and the local economies are adding jobs.”

The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 33,886.47 on April 14, marking a 2.2 percent year-to-date gain. The S&P 500 Index ended that day at 4,137.64, up 7.8 percent on the year.

The dollar on April 13 was trading at 0.90 euros, 0.80 pounds, 132.39 yen and 6.87 yuan.

The next meeting of the Federal Reserve Federal Open Market Committee is scheduled for May 2-3. A few days before that, the Bureau of Economic Analysis will announce its estimate of economic growth in the first quarter. A strong, or even semi-strong, number could embolden Powell and other inflation hawks on the committee, while a weak showing might mean the country has seen the last rate increase for a while.

The American Metals Supply Chain Institute 72nd Annual Gala Dinner is on Wednesday, December 6 at The Yale Club of New York City!

April 2023 Steel Shorts

Supreme Court Again Rejects Section 232 Case

The U.S. Supreme Court on March 27 again declined to hear a challenge to the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum imports.

In March 2018, then-President Donald Trump imposed 25 percent tariffs on steel and 10 percent tariffs on aluminum after the Commerce Department produced a report concluding that “the present quantities and circumstance of steel imports are ‘weakening our internal economy’ and threaten to impair the national security as defined in Section 232.”

A group of steel importing companies challenged the tariffs, arguing that the report was “arbitrary and capricious” and, thus, did not meet the standard required by the law. After losing in two lower courts, they sought a hearing before the Supreme Court, but the request was denied without comment.

In June 2020, the Supreme Court refused to hear a challenge to the tariffs brought by AMSCI, which was then known as AIIS.

Analysts Foresee Dip in Iron Ore Prices

Iron ore prices are expected by some analysts to drop significantly this year because of reduced steel demand and production in China.

Morgan Stanley is predicting a 28 percent drop in prices, CNBC reported, while Commonwealth Bank of Australia foresees a decrease of about 22 percent “as China’s steel demand eases in the second half of the year.”

The news outlet went on to note that Fitch Solutions expects steel demand to soften in China as “rebalancing of the economy away from heavy industry and towards the service sector resumes.”

Increased use of steel scrap by China – tonnage this year is likely to rise by 25 percent – is also a factor, according to Morgan Stanley.

Canada Bans Steel, Aluminum Imports from Russia

Canada in March banned imports of steel and aluminum from Russia.

The move is among the latest by a Western country to punish Russia for its invasion of Ukraine and deny it funding to prosecute the war.

“Ukraine can and must win this war,” Canadian Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland said. “We continue to do everything we can to cut off or limit the revenue used to fund Putin’s illegal and barbaric invasion of Ukraine.”

“We are ensuring Putin cannot pay for his war by selling aluminum and steel in Canada,” Freeland added.

Reuters reported that, in 2021, Canada imported $157.6 million worth of Russian steel and $33.3 million in Russian aluminum.

In February, the United States imposed 200 percent tariffs on aluminum imports from Russia, with President Joe Biden saying, “The Russian aluminum industry is a key part of Russia’s defense industrial base and has played a major role in supplying Russia with weapons and ammunition used in the war.”

E.U. Prolongs, Extends Tariffs on Stainless Steel Fittings from China, Taiwan

The European Union on April 14 prolonged by five years tariffs on stainless steel fittings from China and Taiwan.

The tariffs have been in place since 2017, and the E.U. concluded that lifting them would result in the dumping of 100 million euros in Chinese steel each year.

Officials also extended the tariffs to Malaysia because, according to an announcement from the E.U. Directorate-General for Trade, “an anti- circumvention investigation had found that Chinese producers were using assembly operations there to evade measures applicable to them.”

“Both sets of measures protect E.U. producers of stainless steel fittings … from unfair trading practices wherever these may come from, thereby securing over 500 E.U. jobs,” the announcement stated.

Duties range from 30.7 percent to 64.9 percent for China and from 5.1 percent to 12.1 percent for Taiwan. The rate for Malaysia is 64.9 percent. (Two importers that actually are Malaysian were exempted from the duties.)

CUSTOMS CORNER

CBP has Delayed the Effective Date for Reporting Additional Information on All Imports of Aluminum Articles Subject to Section 232 to May 10, 2023; the Obligation to Pay the 200% Duty Rate on Aluminum Articles from Russia Remains Effective on the March 10 (Russian Origin) and April 10, 2023 (Russian Aluminum Content) Dates

A previous Customs Corner provided news about the new information requirements established by U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) applicable to all imports of aluminum products covered by Section 232. CBP has now delayed the effective date for reporting the smelt and cast country information on the Entry Summary (CBP 7501) from April 10 to May 10, 2023. This delay is stated to be to allow the trade additional time to update software and systems to allow proper reporting in ACE.

https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/bulletins/351f06e. Although the effective date for reporting the smelt and cast information in ACE has been delayed, the obligation to pay 200% duties on covered aluminum products of Russian origin on March 10 and covered products of other origin containing any primary Russian aluminum on April 10 remains in effect. Entries of covered products are required to be filed using the new HTSUS Chapter 99 subheadings and pay the applicable duties.

CBP has advised that “If importers need to update an entry summary, they can file a post summary correction or a prior disclosure.” Post summary corrections (PSCs) can be filed at any time up to 15 days prior to scheduled liquidation of the entry. Prior disclosures would be required once an entry has become liquidated.

It is expected that many importers, particularly for derivative articles, may not have complete and definitive information regarding the source of primary aluminum inputs at the time of entry. Importers should use their best judgement in determining whether their products may be subject to the additional duties, and making corrections through PSCs or prior disclosures as necessary once full information becomes available.

Steven W. Baker
AMSCI Customs Committee Chair
swbaker@swbakerlaw.com