April Market Update
Businesses and consumers are still trying to decipher what the Trump administration’s exact plan is for trade and what it will mean for the overall economy.
President Trump has announced, then delayed, tariffs multiple times. On April 2, in what was to be the biggest imposition of duties on imports so far, Trump unveiled a global approach to tariffs that he said was based on “reciprocity,” though the calculations apparently were based on the size of the trade deficit between a given nation and the United States, not on the tariffs that other nations impose.
“Taxpayers have been ripped off for more than 50 years,” Trump said on what he dubbed “Liberation Day” when announcing the tariffs. “But it is not going to happen anymore.”
Several countries quickly announced countermeasures, critics warned that the plan would lead to a trade war, inflation and possibly a recession, and stock markets plummeted, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average losing more than 10 percent of its value in six days and the S&P 500 Index dropping more than 12 percent during that time.
On April 9, Trump, observing that people “were getting a little bit yippy, a little bit afraid,” announced a 90-day pause in most of the tariffs, though he not only kept the ones targeting Chinese goods in place, he increased them.
“Based on the lack of respect that China has shown to the World’s Markets, I am hereby raising the Tariff charged to China by the United States of America to 125%, effective immediately,” Trump stated in a social media post. “At some point, hopefully in the near future, China will realize that the days of ripping off the U.S.A., and other Countries, is no longer sustainable or acceptable.”
The markets recovered about two-thirds of the previous week’s losses immediately following the reversal, but the rally was short-lived. As of April 21, the Dow was down 9.6 percent since April 2 and 10.3 percent since the start of the year, while the S&P had lost 9 percent and 12.3 percent, respectively.
Trump, meanwhile, has been pushing for monetary policy to offset the disruptive effects of trade policy and has expressed frustration with the Federal Reserve for not lowering interest rates to stimulate the economy. On April 17, Trump posted that Fed Chair Jerome “Powell’s termination cannot come fast enough.” The president took aim at Powell again four days later, writing, “There can be a slowing of the economy unless Mr. Too Late, a major loser, lowers interest rates, NOW.”
Powell’s four-year term (his second) is set to end on May 15, 2026. National Economic Council Director Kevin Hassett told reporters on April 18 that “The president and his team will continue to study the matter” of whether Trump can fire Powell.
In an April 16 speech at the Economic Club of Chicago, Powell said “the U.S. economy is still in a solid position,” while noting that the administration’s policies on trade, immigration, fiscal policy, and regulation “are still evolving, and their effects on the economy remain highly uncertain.”
Expressing a widely-held opinion that the administration disputes, he went on to say, “Tariffs are highly likely to generate at least a temporary rise in inflation. The inflationary effects could also be more persistent.”
Powell then referenced a 1980s movie while delivering more news that Trump surely did not want to hear.
“As that great Chicagoan Ferris Bueller once noted, ‘Life moves pretty fast’” Powell said. “For the time being, we are well positioned to wait for greater clarity before considering any adjustments to our policy stance.”
The target range for the Federal Funds Rate is 4.25-4.5 percent. The Federal Reserve Federal Open Market Committee, the body that sets that range, met most recently on March 19 and made no change to it while observing that, “The unemployment rate has stabilized at a low level in recent months, and labor market conditions remain solid. Inflation remains somewhat elevated.”
Three weeks after the Fed’s meeting, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that year-over-year inflation in March was 2.4 percent. While this was still above the central bank’s target of 2 percent, there has not been a month with lower inflation since February 2021. (Inflation was also at 2.4 percent in September of last year.)
The unemployment rate is at 4.2 percent following the creation of 228,000 jobs in March, according to the bureau. Unemployment has hovered between 4 and 4.3 percent since May 2024.
“Job gains occurred in health care, in social assistance, and in transportation and warehousing,” the agency stated. “Employment also increased in retail trade, partially reflecting the return of workers from a strike.”
Not surprisingly, the bureau also noted that, “Federal government employment declined.” Since Trump took office, about 260,000 federal workers (out of a workforce of 2.3 million) have left their jobs, either voluntarily or not, largely as a result of the work of Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).
Consumer confidence has sunk amid the tariff talk, with the Index of Consumer Sentiment from the University of Michigan’s Surveys of Consumers experiencing a decline in April that was described by the surveys’ director as “pervasive and unanimous across age, income, education, geographic region, and political affiliation.” The index, which has fallen for four straight months, was down nearly 11 percent from March and more than 34 percent from April 2024.
“Consumers report multiple warning signs that raise the risk of recession: expectations for business conditions, personal finances, incomes, inflation, and labor markets all continued to deteriorate this month,” the director said. “The share of consumers expecting unemployment to rise in the year ahead increased for the fifth consecutive month and is now more than double the November 2024 reading and the highest since 2009.”
The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index has also fallen for four months in a row. It lost 7 percent from February to March.
“Consumers’ expectations were especially gloomy, with pessimism about future business conditions deepening and confidence about future employment prospects falling to a 12-year low,” the board’s senior economist, global indicators, said. “Meanwhile, consumers’ optimism about future income – which had held up quite strongly in the past few months – largely vanished, suggesting worries about the economy and labor market have started to spread into consumers’ assessments of their personal situations.”
Confidence has also slipped in the manufacturing sector, though not as dramatically. The Institute for Supply Management’s Purchasing Managers Index decreased by 2.6 percent from February to March, falling below the contraction/expansion threshold for the sector.
“Demand and production retreated and de-staffing continued, as panelists’ companies responded to demand confusion,” the chair of the institute’s Manufacturing Business Survey Committee said. “Price growth accelerated due to tariffs, causing new order placement backlogs, supplier delivery slowdowns and manufacturing inventory growth.”
Housing starts in March were 11.4 percent lower than in February but 1.9 percent higher than in March of last year, according to the Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Existing home sales increased by 4.2 percent from January to February, the National Association of Realtors reported.
“Home buyers are slowly entering the market,” the association’s chief economist said. “Mortgage rates have not changed much, but more inventory and choices are releasing pent-up housing demand.”
The dollar on April 21 was trading at 0.87 euros, 0.75 pounds, 140.82 yen and 7.29 yuan.
Steel Shorts
Steel, Aluminum Tariffs Said Likely to Increase Energy Costs
Higher energy costs are among the downstream effects that can be expected from the Trump administration’s tariffs on steel and aluminum, several analysts told Reuters in April.
The news outlet, citing an analysis by PwC, reported that the 25 percent tariffs now broadly applied to imports of the metals – including derivative products – plus other levies “could increase the total tariff burden for the Energy, Utilities and Resources Industry from $400 million a year to approximately $53 billion a year.” Wind projects, it was noted, could be hit especially hard.
“From an energy perspective, the impact will certainly be large, as we don’t currently have the capacity to manufacture everything domestically,” an analyst from Ernst and Young told Reuters.
In addition, a University of California at San Diego professor said that ongoing shifts in trade policy create “uncertainty” and “anxiety,” which can have a “much bigger impact” on energy investments than even cost increases.
United Steelworkers Remains Firm in Opposition to Nippon Purchase of U.S. Steel
United Steelworkers International has reiterated its opposition to Nippon Steel’s purchase of U.S. Steel.
The labor union’s president, David McCall, told Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent in an April 21 letter that the group is “unalterably opposed” to the $15 billion deal.
President Trump has come out against the purchase, though he has indicated that he could support Nippon taking a minority share of the United States’ third-largest steel producer. McCall, however, expressed opposition to any substantial Nippon ownership.
“The risks posed by Nippon to America’s steel industry, and, thus, national security, cannot be addressed by permitting Nippon to enter into any partnership with U.S. Steel or allowing any investment where Nippon may exercise any degree of influence over U.S. Steel’s decision-making,” he wrote in the letter, according to the Pittsburgh Business Times.
Then-President Biden issued an order blocking the deal on Jan. 3, stating that it “threatens to impair the national security of the United States.”
Notwithstanding the opposition of the national union, the proposed purchase may have more support at the local level, as The Washington Post reported in December, writing that “many steelworkers see [the] deal as [a] lifeline for their aging mills.”
Chamber of Commerce Cites Tariff Harm to Domestic Manufacturing
Steel and aluminum tariffs are “increasing costs for U.S. manufacturers and putting them at a disadvantage to their global competitors,” according to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.
In a March 25 website post, a senior chamber official argued that the 25 percent tariffs on the metals will also “raise the cost of living for consumers” in the United States, both because of the levies themselves and because of retaliatory measures implemented by other countries.
“U.S. steel benchmarks are now roughly twice world prices,” the official wrote. “Aluminum prices are also up sharply as more than half of U.S. demand is met by imports, most of which come from Canada. Prices hikes for industrial inputs like steel and aluminum hurt a broad swath of downstream manufacturers across the United States.”
While President Trump also imposed tariffs on steel and aluminum imports during his first term, the current approach, the official noted, is more extensive, in terms of both the countries and the products to which they are applied. Also, there is no exemption process this time.
“Steel and aluminum … come in a wide variety of highly-specialized forms, and some of these are either not available from domestic manufacturers or are produced in insufficient quantities in the United States,” the official wrote, adding, “When a product is not otherwise readily available except by import, the manufacturer has little recourse but to pay the tariff.”
India Implements 12% Tariff on Many Steel Imports
India has imposed a 12 percent tariff on steel imports from China and other countries.
The “safeguard duty” is set to be in effect for 200 days in the world’s second-largest steel producing nation.
While the tariff is largely a response to Chinese overcapacity in the steel market, the South China Morning Post noted that, “The move is New Delhi’s first big trade policy shift since U.S. President Donald Trump imposed a wide range of tariffs on countries in April, kicking off a bitter trade war with China.” Trump has paused for 90 days the tariffs that were announced on April 2, but a 25 percent levy on steel and aluminum imports into the United States remains in place.
“This move will provide critical relief to domestic producers, especially small and medium-scale enterprises, who have faced immense pressure from rising imports,” India’s steel minister said.
CUSTOMS CORNER
President Trump’s Minimum 10% Tariff Effective April 5, 2025; Full Reciprocal Tariffs Effective April 9, 2025
President Trump announced his reciprocal tariffs on April 2, 2025, establishing duty rates for all merchandise from all countries that are stated to be based on the total of not only the duties those countries charge goods from the US, but also other taxes, fees, and restrictions placed on imports from the U. S. These include Value Added Taxes (VAT) and a long list of claimed non-tariff barriers detailed by the US Trade Representative in the April 1, 2025, National Trade Estimate Report on FOREIGN TRADE BARRIERS.
https://globalbusiness.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2025-National-Trade-Estimate-Report.pdf
The Executive Order includes links to the Annex I list of duty rates by country (with all others at a 10% minimum) and the Annex II list of excluded items, including copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber articles, certain critical minerals, and energy and energy products. Also excluded are any products subject to a Section 232 duty (currently steel/aluminum and derivatives, and autos/parts,) goods from countries subject to a Column 2 duty, and goods from Canada and Mexico (which remain subject to the prior Orders covering those countries.)
The reciprocal tariffs are stated to be set at 50% of the effective rate of tariffs and other barriers established in each country, subject to the 10% minimum level. That 10% duty for all countries becomes effective at 12:01 am EDT on April 5, 2025. The higher individual country rates become applicable at 12:01 am EDT on April 9, 2025. The reciprocal duties are assessed in addition to any other applicable duties, including regular duties, antidumping and countervailing duties, Section 301 duties, and IEEPA duties. Where Section 232 duties apply, they will be collected and the reciprocal duties will not.
In transit exclusions apply to goods in transit on the final mode of transit before April 5 and April 9, respectively. Products subject to the new duties entered into Foreign Trade Zones must be entered as privileged foreign merchandise.
U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued a CSMS Guidance document specifying the order in which multiple HTS numbers covering various duty requirements must be listed on entry.
https://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/USDHSCBP-3d0d7e3?wgt_ref=USDHSCBP_WIDGET_2
The Executive Order includes a provision exempting the value of any US content from the reciprocal duties, provided the US content is at least 20% of the value of the merchandise. CBP is authorized to collect and verify any necessary information to support any such claims.
CBP Issues Guidance on Reciprocal Tariffs Effective April 5 and April 9, 2025
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Ut elit tellus, luctus nec ullamcorper mattis, pulvinar dapibus leo.
CBP Issues Updated Guidance on Additional Reciprocal Tariffs on China Effective April 9, 2025
U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued Guidance documents on the reciprocal tariffs imposed by President Trump’s April 2, 2025 Executive Order, with 10% duties for all countries effective April 5, 2025, and the 10% rate replaced for 83 countries with higher rates effective on April 9, 2025. The April 5 Guidance is in CSMS Message 64649265:
https://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/USDHSCBP-3da7831?wgt_ref=USDHSCBP_WIDGET_2
The April 9 Guidance is in CSMS Message 64680374:
https://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/USDHSCBP-3daf1b6?wgt_ref=USDHSCBP_WIDGET_2
The April 9 Guidance includes a list of the applicable duty rates for the 83 countries subject to rates above 10%.
Implementation of the tariffs will require the use of supplemental Chapter 99 HTSUS classifications for all imports. Several classes of goods are exempt from the reciprocal duties, and have their own Chapter 99 classifications. These include articles the product of Canada, articles the product of Mexico, articles subject to Section 232 duties, articles from countries subject to Column 2 duty rates, articles exempted in the Presidential Order Annex 2 (including copper, pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, lumber articles, certain critical minerals, and energy and energy products,) and certain donations and informational materials. There is also a partial exemption available for the documented US content of articles where that content is at least 20% of the value of the article. Value information must be supplied to claim the exemption. Exclusions also apply to most, although not all, articles classified in Chapter 98 of the HTSUS.
Subject goods entered into Foreign Trade Zones must be entered as privileged foreign merchandise. Drawback is available for the reciprocal duties. Articles loaded and in transit on the final mode of transportation before April 5 and/or April 9 and entered into the US before May 27, 2025 are excluded from the 10% (loaded before April 5) or individual country rates, except that goods from higher rate countries loaded and in transit between April 5 and April 8 will be subject to the 10% rate only.
Detailed reporting requirements, including the sequence for reporting multiple HTSUS numbers, are provided.
CBP Issues Updated Guidance on the Partial Pause for Most Reciprocal Tariffs and the Increase to 125% for China Effective April 10, 2025
U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has issued an updated Guidance document on the additional reciprocal tariffs imposed by President Trump on merchandise from China. The update indicates that the previously announced 34% rate for China is increased to 84%. The rate increase remains effective for goods imported beginning on April 9, 2025.
All exemptions to the reciprocal tariffs, including the exemption for goods subject to Section 232, remain unchanged.
https://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/USDHSCBP-3db0e50?wgt_ref=USDHSCBP_WIDGET_2
Steven W. Baker
AMSCI Customs Committee Chair
swbaker@swbakerlaw.com
AMSCI 2025 Events
|