May 2026 Market Update
The U.S. economy grew at an annualized rate of 2 percent during the first quarter of 2026, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis.
The agency attributed the growth to increases in investment, exports, consumer spending and government spending. Growth in Q4 2025 was 0.5 percent.
The labor market has also shown gains recently, with the economy adding 115,000 jobs in April following 185,000 in March, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported. Notwithstanding the first back-to-back months of gains in a year, some analysts offered a skeptical take.
“Labor demand and supply remain in an uneasy balance … and labor market conditions could weaken again swiftly as financial pressures from rising prices weigh on household purchasing power,” the chief U.S. economist at BMO Capital Markets told Reuters. “There is nothing in this report to move the Fed off the sidelines on future rate cuts.”
Not only is the Federal Reserve declining to cut interest rates, but, as The Wall Street Journal reported in early May, members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) “are starting to talk about the conditions that would warrant a hike.” Dallas Fed President Lorie Logan, for example, said it “could plausibly be appropriate for the … next rate change to be either an increase or a cut.”
The Federal Reserve reduced the target range for the federal funds rate – which is now 3.5 to 3.75 percent – by a quarter-point three meetings in a row at the end of 2025, but it has made no changes since December.
A hike would surely draw criticism from President Trump, who now has his choice for Fed chair – Kevin Warsh – in place. Previous chair Jerome Powell, who served from 2018 until May of this year and was frequently criticized by Trump for not supporting enough rate cuts – remains a voting member of the FOMC.
Consistently elevated inflation has made the case for interest rate reductions more difficult to make. The consumer price index in April showed price increases of 3.8 percent over the previous year – the highest since April 2023 – including 54.3 percent for fuel oil and 17.9 percent for all energy goods, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Energy costs are being pushed up, at least in part, by the war in Iran, with that country still effectively closing the Strait of Hormuz – through which about 20 percent of the world’s oil transits – while negotiations continue during a cease fire.
The Fed’s target inflation rate is 2 percent, and during the central bank’s April 28-29 meeting, there was some pessimism about reaching that target – which has not been met since February 2021 – anytime soon.
“Almost all participants noted that there was a risk that the conflict in the Middle East could persist for an extended period or that, even after the conflict ended, the prices of oil and other commodities could remain elevated for longer than expected,” the minutes of the meeting recorded. “In such scenarios, these participants expected continued upward pressure on inflation arising from supply chain disruptions, high energy prices, or the pass-through of higher input costs to other prices. The vast majority of participants noted an increased risk that inflation would take longer to return to the Committee’s 2 percent objective than they had previously expected.”
Tariffs implemented by Trump are also a factor, and a Federal Reserve analysis released in April found “strong evidence that tariff changes in 2025 have raised core goods prices.”
“Under our baseline estimates, tariff changes through November 2025 raised core goods PCE [personal consumption expenditures] prices cumulatively by 3.1% through February 2026, explaining the entirety of excess inflation in the core goods category relative to pre-pandemic inflation rates and boosting core PCE prices as a whole by 0.8 percent.”
Amid the higher prices, consumer confidence appears to be slipping. The Index of Consumer Sentiment from the University of Michigan’s Surveys of Consumers fell 10 percent from April to May, the third straight monthly decline, with the surveys’ director noting that “cost of living continues to be a first-order concern, with 57% of consumers spontaneously mentioning that high prices were eroding their personal finances, up from 50% last month.”
The Consumer Confidence Index from The Conference Board dipped less than 1 percent from April to May.
“Consumers’ write-in responses on factors affecting the economy continued to skew towards pessimism in May,” the organization reported. “References to prices and oil and gas increased in frequency for a second consecutive month, while mentions of war, geopolitics and conflict remained elevated – likely signaling consumers’ underlying concerns about the inflationary impacts of the war in the Middle East on their wallets.”
Confidence among manufacturers held steady in April and has now been at a level indicating expansion in the sector four months in a row – following eight months below it – according to the Institute for Supply Management’s Purchasing Managers Index. Concerns about Iran and tariffs, however, remain.
“In this second month of the Iran War (at the time of data collection), 31 percent of the comments were positive and 69 percent negative, with a positive to negative sentiment ratio of 1 to 2.2,” the chair of the institute’s Manufacturing Business Survey Committee said. “Among comments, the war was mentioned in 47 percent and tariffs in 18 percent. As was the case last month, some panelists referenced both topics within a single comment or in mixed sentiment.”
Housing starts in April declined 2.8 percent from March but were 4.6 percent above the April 2025 level, according to the Census Bureau and the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Existing home sales were largely unchanged from March to April, increasing by 0.2 percent, the National Association of Realtors reported.
“Despite mixed macroeconomic signals – including a record-high stock market and historically low consumer confidence – home sales were modestly boosted by the continued improvement in housing affordability,” the association’s chief economist said. “Mortgage rates are lower from a year ago, and average income growth is outpacing home price gains.”
The Dow Jones Industrial Average closed at 50,579.7 on May 22, up 5.24 percent on the year. The S&P 500 Index ended the day at 7,473.47, for a year-to-date gain of 9.17 percent.
The dollar on May 22 was trading at 0.86 euros, 0.74 pounds, 159.03 yen and 6.8 yuan.
AMSCI Chairman Jose Gasca Represents AMSCI at TXF Amsterdam 2026
AMSCI Chairman Jose F. Gasca represented the American Metals Supply Chain Institute (AMSCI) at TXF Amsterdam 2026: Global Natural Resources & Commodities Finance, held May 11–13 in Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Jose participated in a panel discussion examining the impact of evolving trade policies, tariffs, and geopolitical developments on global commodity markets and supply chains. Drawing on his experience as an international metals trader and supply chain executive, he shared insights on how companies have adapted to the changing trade environment by diversifying operations, strengthening regional supply chains, and increasing value-added services closer to end markets.
During the discussion, Jose highlighted the significant transformation of global steel and aluminum trade since the introduction of Section 232 tariffs in 2018, noting that successful companies have focused on adaptation, risk management, and supply chain resilience rather than relying solely on traditional global trading models.
The conference brought together leading financiers, traders, producers, and industry stakeholders from around the world to discuss the future of commodity finance, trade flows, sustainability, and global market developments.
AMSCI appreciates Jose’s continued leadership and his efforts to represent the interests and perspectives of the metals supply chain community on the international stage
May 2026 Steel Shorts
U.S. Negotiators Seek to Use USMCA to Block Steel Derivatives
Preventing the importation of certain steel products into North America is one of the United States’ priorities during negotiations regarding an extension of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, according to Deputy U.S. Trade Representative Jeffrey Goettman.
During a May 12 appearance at the American Iron and Steel Institute’s general meeting, Goettman said that the three countries need to work together to keep out derivative goods made from cheap foreign steel.
“As we look at USMCA in particular, we’re trying to shut down, what I would call, the side door of things coming into the United States through Mexico and Canada, using inputs that are much cheaper than the inputs that you can get directly into the United States,” Goettman said.
The USMCA is up for review by all parties this year. If it is not extended by July 1, it will be subject to additional reviews every year until it expires in 2036. If it is extended, it would remain in force for 16 more years without annual reviews.
Canada Selling More Aluminum in Europe, Less in the U.S.
With the war in Iran driving up aluminum prices, Canada is reportedly looking to sell more of the metal in Europe to avoid tariffs in the United States.
About 9 percent of the world’s aluminum smelting capacity is in the Middle East and the war, including Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz, has cut global supply and pushed up costs – which were already higher in the United States because of the 50 percent tariff imposed by the Trump administration in 2025.
“When comparing U.S. and E.U. prices from an export perspective one has to shave off the portion going to the U.S. Treasury in tariffs to get to comparable netbacks,” the president of the Aluminium Association of Canada told Reuters. “This is why the E.U. option remains attractive to Canada, adding pressure on the U.S. market.”
The share of aluminum imports into the United States that were from Canada, Reuters reported, citing data from TDM, fell from 75 percent in the first quarter of 2024 to 54 percent in Q1 of this year.
Copper Contributing to Rising Home-Building Costs
Rising copper prices are among the factors driving up home-building costs, The Wall Street Journal reported in May.
The publication noted that, in addition to increases in the cost of lumber, cement, plastic and other materials, “The data-center boom and disruptions at the world’s second-largest copper mine have pushed the metal’s prices to records.”
“War has played a part in pushing copper prices to records, because the fighting choked off supplies of sulfuric acid needed to produce a big chunk of the world’s copper,” the Journal reported. “Meanwhile, disruptions at Freeport-McMoRan’s huge Grasberg mine in Indonesia have traders betting that there will be a lot less copper to go around as data centers, electric-vehicle makers and others show voracious demand for the metal essential to everything electric.”
Wiring, plumbing, appliances and other components of a house typically require more than 400 pounds of copper, according to the paper.
European Parliament Approves Steel Tariffs, Quotas
The European Parliament on May 19 overwhelmingly approved an aggressive set of steel quotas and tariffs.
The plan, which was passed by a vote of 606-16 with 39 abstentions, will slash steel import quotas by 47 percent to 18.3 million metric tons per year, which would match the import level in 2013, and will double the duties assessed when quotas are exceeded to 50 percent. The measure also includes “melt and pour” requirements intended to thwart circumvention.
“Europe needs a strong and competitive steel industry built on trade, innovation and fair competition,” Parliament member Karin Karlsbro of Sweden said. “Combatting the negative trade effects of global overcapacity is essential.”
The measure now awaits formal approval by the European Council, which agreed to the terms of the plan in April following discussions with Parliament. It will then go into effect on July 1, replacing existing safeguards that are set to expire on June 30.
CUSTOMS CORNER
CBP Issues Additional Information on the CAPE process for IEEPA Duty Refunds USCIT Panel Finds Section 122 Duties Unlawful but Limits Remedies
U. S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) began use of the Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries (CAPE) procedure for IEEPA Refunds on April 20, 2026. Although Phase I of CAPE is limited to unliquidated entries, and liquidated entries no more than 80 days past liquidation, and excludes a number of different entry types and entries under certain conditions, it has been reported that during the first week importers have filed and CBP has validated claims covering about 15% of eligible entries. Refunds are scheduled to begin being issued during the week of May 11.
CBP has issued additional information regarding CAPE issues. There is an updated webpage providing details about the system and a list of FAQs. https://www.cbp.gov/trade/programs-administration/trade-remedies/ieepa-duty-refunds. In CSMS # 68536553 CBP describes multiple ACE Reports that can be used for monitoring CAPE Refund Claims.
https://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/USDHSCBP-415c8e9?wgt_ref=USDHSCBP_WIDGET_2
CSMS # 68569567 discusses Best Practices for protecting information regarding IEEPA refunds. https://content.govdelivery.com/bulletins/gd/USDHSCBP-41649df?wgt_ref=USDHSCBP_WIDGET_2.
CSMS # 68397097 provides information about the updated ACE Entry Summary Error Dictionary.
https://content.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDHSCBP/bulletins/413a829
Information regarding processing of entries not covered in Phase I remains limited and uncertain. The Order from the CIT, although currently suspended, requires all IEEPA entries regardless of liquidation status to be refunded by CBP; CBP asserts it does not have the authority to do so for liquidated entries beyond the 90 day (reduced to 80 days for processing requirements) voluntary reliquidation authority. The effect and/or necessity of filing protests or individual lawsuits is unclear. Whether the government will appeal the CIT Order, and if so what effect that may have, is also not known.
There are also economic considerations regarding the costs of filing protests and/or lawsuits in relation to the potential refunds available to an importer, and the administrative burden of establishing the required ACE Portal (and ACH Refund account) or paying for a broker’s filing services.
USCIT Panel Finds Section 122 Duties Unlawful but Limits Remedies
A three judge panel of the USCIT, in a split decision issued on May 7, 2026, found that the duties imposed by the Trump administration under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 were unlawful. These duties were imposed, in part, as a partial, temporary replacement for the IEEPA duties previously found unlawful by the Supreme Court. The court found that the Presidential Proclamation relied on current account and trade deficits rather than the balance-of-payments deficits required by the statute. The CIT panel, however, limited relief – both refund of duties and a permanent injunction against their collection – to the named importer clients. These included two private companies and the State of Washington acting as an importer of record. The companion case brought by more than 20 states was dismissed for lack of standing as they claimed only indirect economic harm.
The Trump administration has already indicated its intention to appeal the CIT decision on the merits. Importers other than the named plaintiffs will have to file additional legal claims in order to take advantage of the CIT findings.
Steven W. Baker
AMSCI Customs Committee Chair
swbaker@swbakerlaw.com
Thank You – AMSCI Annual Golf Outing
Dear AMSCI Members and Friends,
On behalf of AMSCI, thank you for joining us at the Annual Golf Outing on Tuesday, May 12, at Lakewood Golf Club. Your participation and support helped make the event a great success.
We are especially grateful to all attendees and supporters, and extend a special thank you to Tom Adger of Tri-State Maritime Services / Alabama Steel Terminals, Peter Svensson of Clipper Americas Inc., and David Wilkins Sr. of Associated Terminals for their efforts in organizing the outing and dinner. Special thank you to Pam Cascio of C-River Logistics for capturing so many great moments from the event through her wonderful photos!
AMSCI 2026 Events Calendar
AMSCI 75th Annual Dinner (SOLD OUT)
Date: Wednesday, November 18, 2026
Time: 5:00 PM – 7:00 PM | Cocktail Networking Reception (Cambridge Room)
7:00 PM – 9:00 PM | Dinner (Harvard Hall)
Location: The Harvard Club of NYC
Formal dinner and networking in a historic New York venue.
🎄 AMSCI Annual Gulf Region Christmas Dinner
Date: Thursday, December 10, 2026
Time: 6:00 PM – 10:00 PM
Location: Aspen Ballroom, The Houstonian Hotel, Club & Spa | Houston, TX
Celebrate the season with industry peers in a festive setting.