By Laura Miller, Steel Market Update, Laura@SteelMarketUpdate.com
The US and European Union are making good on their efforts to speed up global steel discussions.
US Trade Representative Katherine Tai and EC Executive Vice President Valdis Dombrovskis met on Oct. 30 for the second time in several weeks, with discussions on addressing carbon intensity and overcapacity in steel and aluminum at the forefront of their meeting.
Tai reiterated “the US’ commitment to pursuing a high-ambition global arrangement with the European Union,” to address those issues, the USTR office said in a statement.
No further details of the steel arrangement discussions were provided, however, and the USTR office did not respond to Steel Market Update’s request for additional information.
Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), spoke with SMU regarding the meeting of the two leaders and their efforts to address these difficult issues.
Noting there have been previous efforts to address global overcapacities in steel, but no concrete action as overcapacity remains, “We’re in a wait and see mode” on these talks, Dempsey said.
Any arrangements need to really consider the fact that there is a big differential on the carbon intensity between steel made in the US and Europe and in other parts of the world.
“I’m supportive of the administration’s efforts to work on these important issues, but you know I’m not ready to be optimistic. We’re waiting to see how much progress can be made,” Dempsey said.
“The goals are laudable, but it’s very important that we actually reach a result that will create effective enforceable mechanisms that discourage the importing of steel that’s much higher in carbon intensity…and that actually put some type of penalty on countries that are exacerbating the global overcapacity crisis,” Dempsey noted.
Richard Chriss, president and international trade counsel for the American Metals Supply Chain Institute (AMSCI), pointed out to SMU that the acceleration of these steel talks raises several important questions. As Tai said earlier this year that a global sustainable steel arrangement would require the participation of other countries and economies, one major question being: What additional countries have signed up for this global steel arrangement, if any? Additionally, what are the ‘deliverables’ expected from current US-EU steel talks and when will stakeholders be asked for input?
“While talks centered around the global sustainable steel arrangement appear to be one of the key focal points for the administration’s trade policy, these talks should complement and not substitute for an ambitious US trade policy that includes initiating and leading negotiations with our global trading partners to produce new job-creating market access opportunities for American manufacturers through commitments that are binding and enforceable,” Chriss stated.